Set inside the humble California abode of Dota 2 production studio Beyond the Summit, The Summit 6 is far from the glitz and glamour of the majors. But its hardly low profile, however. All eight teams in attendance this weekend are bound for the Boston Major, and performance at The Summit 6 will set the tone for these squads heading into the Boston Major group stages.In the first matchup of the day, the CIS squad of Virtus.Pro were matched against EHOME, a Chinese team that has seen some strong success both at home and abroad. Game 1 saw EHOME first-pick a Drow Ranger for Liu Sylar Jiajun, broadcasting an overall push-heavy Drow strat that would center around Jiajun and Wang old chicken Zhiyongs Medusa. Virtus.Pro responded with Roman RAMZES666 Kushnarevs Luna, and three early kills on Ren eLeVeN Yangweis Dark Seer secured a snowball for Virtus.Pro, handing them the Game 1 victory.EHOME struck back in Game 2, returning to the Drow Ranger lineup but putting Zhiyong on a more aggressive Huskar. Zhiyongs Huskar tallied 12 kills in 33 minutes, bolstered by Liu Garder Xinzhous strength-sapping Undying. Forced to Game 3, Virtus.Pro allowed Drow and Undying back through the draft, but went for a dual-ranged core lineup of Weaver and Sniper, and an aggressive Chen pick for four-role Ilya Lil Ilyuk. Putting significant pressure on Zhiyongs Tinker and Yangweis offlane Venomancer, Virtus.Pro surged over EHOME and secured a semifinal spot, sending EHOME to the lower bracket in the process.The match of the day was a rematch between Wings Gaming and Team NP in a best-of-three series, days after their grand finals match at the Northern Arena BEAT Invitational. Wings won that showdown 2-0. On Wednesday, Team NP looked strong and set for revenge in Game 1, with Kurtis Aui_2000 Ling on a monstrous streak as Ursa. Several crucial fights in the late game began to slowly go Wings way, however, and Chu shadow Zeyu built up to a point where one lost teamfight for NP meant the game swinging the other way. Wings closed out Game 1, victorious even in a kill deficit and only 1.3 percent advantage in net worth.Game 2 was another close conflict between the two teams. Wings Gaming held an early advantage, but Jacky EternaLEnVy Mao found space to drag the net worth graph his way on Alchemist. This game, it was Zhou bLink Yang making the plays on Invoker, alongside Li iceice Peng, who landed several key Ice Blasts on Mao and NP. Wings Gaming beat NP 2-0 for the second time in a week, and would go on to play Virtus.Pro in the final series of the day.In the semifinal matchup, Virtus.Pro established an early lead over Wings Gaming with Kushnarevs Lifestealer securing a 4-times multi-kill at only the 12-minute mark. Wings had tools to take the game late, with Zeyu on a farming Naga Siren and Zhang Faith_bian Ruida dealing massive damage on his offlane Venomancer, but it wasnt enough to hold back VP from taking Game 1.On match point, Wings combo of Zeyu on Slark and Zhang Innocence Yipings Rubick found key kills in the early game. Meanwhile, Virtus.Pros Vladimir No[o]one Minenko shone bright on a mid-lane Sniper pick, with 85 percent kill participation and over 29,000 damage dealt to heroes. Combine this with Kushnarevs Lifestealer returning for Round 2 and stifling Wings offlane, accumulating five kills on Ruidas Sand King over the course of the game, and it was a quick 2-0 for Virtus.Pro.The CIS squad continues on to the winners finals and a guaranteed top-three finish, while the TI6 victor Wings Gaming drops to the lower bracket.Stitched Royals Jerseys . -- Bobby Ryan helped the U. Kansas City Royals Gear . The Oilers come in having lost five in a row (0-4-1) and 16 of their last 20 games, dropping a 2-1 decision to the Vancouver Canucks on Tuesday. https://www.cheaproyals.com/ .J. -- Seven games into a disappointing season, New York Giants defensive catalyst Jason Pierre-Paul is getting the feeling hes back. Custom Kansas City Royals Jerseys . Its an influence in football and a big part of the game. Kansas City Royals Pro Shop .com) - The Montreal Canadiens will try to halt their longest losing streak of the season when they host the struggling New York Islanders in tonights clash at the Bell Centre.129-100. Did you watch that?(More importantly, did you pick up?Jonathon Simmons?)Its just one game. A little more than 1 percent of our season. Lest we forget, we are playing fantasy basketball.The Golden State Warriors could go 42-40 or 81-1. In the big picture, some early-season struggles -- including Tuesdays thumping at the hands of the San Antonio Spurs?-- are not going to affect?Stephen Curry?and Kevin Durants seasonlong offensive load.On paper? Durant was just fine with 27 points and 10 rebounds.Draymond Green? Better than fine with 18 points, 12 rebounds, six assists and two blocks.And if youre rostering Curry? The enterprise wasnt a total loss: 26 points, three 3-pointers and four assists in 34 minutes.(Klay Thompson and the?Zaza Pachulia-led consortium at center were another story. No Andrew Bogut made a big one-game difference on the boards.)So Im not here to panic.I am hot take-less.Im just here to tell you that youve all been absolutely, historically, metaphysically dead wrong regarding Currys value.His Average Draft Position of 3.7 proves it.Last season, Curry completed the greatest season in the history of fantasy basketball.(Full disclosure: I told you to look into trading him, based on the fact that no one -- no one -- had ever kept up his torrid first-half shooting pace during a full 82-game campaign. And while I was technically correct -- Curry did drop a little over the second half -- he still posted the best fantasy season ever.)Curry dropkicked the Player Rater with an aggregate score of 23.60, almost five full points ahead of his closest competition (James Harden at 18.83).Thats 25 percent more production than No. 2 (Harden), 33 percent more than Currys newest teammate, Durant, and 45 percent better than Durants latest ex-teammate,?Russell Westbrook.Yet as of opening night, Curry had dropped to No. 3 overall (3.7 ADP), well behind Westbrook (1.9) and Harden (2.2). Curry is closer to sliding behind Karl-Anthony Towns (4.6) and Durant (5.0) for the fifth spot.Youre saying that Curry will fall from 23.60 player rater points to about 18 points. Oh, youre not? Because thats what a drop to No. 3 would look like!Youre saying Harden and Westbrook will rise closer toward the 20 player rater-point range, while Curry slides to about 18. On paper, at first glance, the dynamics of your fantasy valuation are simple to grasp.To wit: You remove last seasons No. 3 overall player (Durant) from a high-usage partnership with last years No. 4 overall player (Westbrook).Then you combine Durant with last seasons No. 1 player (Curry), realizing theyll have to share the ball a bit more than Durant and Westbrook did for Durant to be happy.Following this logic, Durant will have to vulture touches from Curry, since Durants usage rate (30.6) more than doubles the small forward he is displacing (Harrison Barnes (14.9).Yet on the NBAs opening night (a one-game sample size, but still), Curry attempted a robust 18 shots. In 2015-16, he averaged 20.2 attempts per game.Curry launched 10 3-pointers on Tuesday and only made three. In 2015-16, Curry averaged 11.2 3-point attempts and made 5.1. For just about any other NBA player, three 3-pointers per game would be phenomenal.But even averaging three 3-pointers, Curry could still be our fantasy MVP. So far, the evidence that Curry will slide from fantasys top spot is purely anecdotal.Lets look at the arguments aimed against him.1. Durant will steal Currys offenseThis assumption lies in the misguided notion that Curry is a volume-dependent player.Which ignores that even if Curry was a volume-dependent player, hes unlikely to suffer more than a 10 percent to 15 percent hit in the volume-based fantasy categories Durant is liable to vulture from his point guard (points, 3-pointers).I base this on what has happened in past superteam conflagrations. My favorite comp is LeBron Decision 1.0: How?LeBron James joining the Heat --?Dwyane Wades Heat -- depressed Wades statistical output.Its a similar situation. The combining of two top talents at a career peak. (As opposed to LeBron Decision 2.0, where the surrounding stars -- Kyrie Irving and Kevin Love -- had other issues fighting their production).Wade suffered only a 5 percent drop in aggregate fantasy value.2009-10 Wade: 26.6 PTS, 19.6 FGA, 6.5 AST, 4.8 REB, 1.8 STL, 1.1 BLK, 0.9 3PT, .476 FG% 2010-11 Wade: 25.5 PTS, 18.2 FGA, 4.6 AST, 6.4 REB, 1.5 STL, 1.1 BLK, 0.8 3PT, .500 FG%Wade attempted fewer shots, but LeBrons presence created more space and drove up his field goal percentage. He only scored 1.1 points per game less. Wades assists dropped, but his rebounds rose.Take a look at Currys line from last year. Heres what a 5 percent volume drop would look like across the board.2015-16 Curry: 30.1 PTS, 20.2 FGA, 6.7 AST, 5.4 REB, 2.1 STL, 0.2 BLK, 5.1 3PT, .504 FG% 2016-17 Curry: 28.6 PTS, 19.2 FGA, 6.44 AST, 5.dddddddddddd1 REB, 2.0 STL, 0.2 BLK, 4.8 3PT, .504 FG%Thats still most likely a No. 1 overall in fantasy stat line. Versatile, well-matched superstars figure out how to mesh. And Curry/Durant is supremely well-matched. (By the way, this valuation roughly equivocates with ESPNs projected line, which has Curry ranked No. 4 overall. I respectfully disagree that this valuation would leave him behind Harden, Westbrook and Towns.)2. Loss of touches will cleave out a hunk of Currys fantasy valueA lot of people fixate on the boffo scoring numbers (first in fantasy points scored production). But Currys fantasy portfolio is so diversified that its hard to keep up with all of his strengths.Curry was fantasys top steals producer in 2015-16 (3.67 player rater points). He was fantasys top free throw performer (2.84 player rater points). He was ninth in field goal percentage production (2.55 points),?while destroying every 3-point production metric in sight. He was eighth in assist production. Among point guards, he was third in rebounding.In the negative column? He didnt block a whole lot of shots.Curry generates so much value via percentages, steals, assists and rebounds (relative to his position) that even a 20 percent drop in shot attempts (and its accompanying drop in field goal percentage production, since that stat depends on volume of shot attempts), points scored and 3-pointers wouldnt take his No. 1 status.And before you rail some more about Durant vs. Barnes, remember that the Warriors had to sacrifice some depth to fit KD under the cap.Even after a 20 percent drop, Curry would still have 20.95 player rater points. Which would still beat 2015-16 Harden by over two player rater points.For sake of argument, lets leave Curry at 20.9 player rater points.3. Harden will gain value under Mike DAntoniEveryone gains value under Mike DAntoni. Tom Gugliotta is still gaining value under Mike DAntoni, and he retired 11 years ago.And Im statistically salivating about the Harden playing point guard. DAntonis system is PG-driven. Harden will absolutely hit career highs within the new?Houston Rockets?coachs pace-inflated system.But the truth is that Harden doesnt have much further to rise. Hardens fantasy production is a little more volume-driven than Currys. A small rise in assists isnt going to accompany boosts across the board ... especially in efficiency-driven categories. And triple that thought in a turnover league.Hardens field goal percentage isnt going to rise. Outside of a 20 percent increase in assist production, his other volume-based numbers might see a 10 percent bump at best.Lets be generous and factor in a 10 percent bump in aggregate value. Absolute best case, Harden lands around 20.6 player rater points, which would still be behind our 20 percent volume-devalued Curry.4. Westbrook would gain value without DurantNo Durant. Contact year. Westbrook will run wild.But how much wilder can Westbrook run than he did in 2015-16? Lets go to our fantasy projections, a sort of mélange between his 2014-15 (injured KD-inflated) and 2015-16 (more efficient) stats.2016-17 Westbrook: 28.7 PTS, 9.5 AST, 8.3 REB, 1.9 STL, 0.3 BLK, 1.4 3PTNice volume, but Westbrooks 3-point and field goal percentage production will still lack a No. 1 overall panache.Like Harden, volume dependency lowers your fantasy floor.Trading an assist and a some field goal percentage for five extra points and a half-rebound per game will not push Westbrook past our 20-percent-depressed Curry.These projected numbers would nudge Westbrook into the 18-player rater-point range.Which would still leave him at No. 3 overall, at best.Lets go further. Even with an ultra-generous, somewhat-historic 20 percent rise in overall aggregate value? Which would basically leave him averaging a triple-double?Westbrook would land at 19.5 player rater points.Which would still be No. 3 overall at best.ConclusionFine. Lets bump up Harden 20 percent overall too. Which is less likely to happen than a 20 percent Curry drop.That would give Harden about 22.4 player rater points.Even factoring the most generous of pro-Harden, anti-Curry statistical projections? Curry still has a punchers chance at finishing No. 1 overall.Given his second-year status, Towns might have a better chance of displacing Curry.Heck. Given a higher word allotment, I could marshal an argument that Curry and Durant could finish 1-2 on the Player Rater.Dont get snowed by volume. Pure volume is for amateurs. Without an accompanying bump in efficiency, usage can only carry you so far.And in a turnover league? The discussion is expunged. Any pro-Harden/Westbrook argument loses 99 percent of its oxygen.In the end?Youre being very, very mean to Steph Curry. ' ' '